Fake Before–After Photos

Botox, fillers, skin boosters - 1 session

Lighting · Pose / angle · Photoshop

This before/after is misleading about what one session of Botox, fillers, and skinboosters can realistically achieve. The 'before' shows stronger muscle engagement (more pronounced crow's feet and nasolabial folds), while the 'after' is visibly more relaxed. Much of the apparent transformation — going from roughly 45–50 to looking 30 — comes from presentation choices rather than injectables alone: softer, more frontal lighting (even the eye color appears lighter), added makeup, and what looks like serum applied to the skin to create a dewy finish. These factors significantly reduce the appearance of shadows, texture, and fine lines. The treatments likely produced real results, but the photography and styling are doing a lot of the heavy lifting here.

8-week transformation with PDRN Serum Beautivana

AI generated

This image is likely AI-generated. Real skin doesn’t behave like this, and the same synthetic face keeps reappearing. People need to learn to use better AI prompts — and stop misleading consumers.

Hair restoration results

Photoshop · AI generated · same photo

This is heavily photoshopped. The hair in the "after" looks painted on — the edges are too perfect, the density is unnatural, and the scalp texture is completely smoothed out. The same photo reused and edited: identical head position, lighting, and facial contours.

Hair transformation with Hair Filler — 4 sessions at 2-week intervals.

Other

This is misleading. “‘Hair filler’ is a peptide/HA scalp injectable. It may improve scalp quality but does not create new hair follicles or increase density in weeks. The ‘after’ shows a different hair arrangement and direction, with surrounding hair combed forward to cover the thinning area. There’s no clear increase in follicle density. Styling alone can create this illusion — it’s not 8-week regrowth.

Non-surgical hair loss treatments

Photoshop

Same setting, same lighting — same day. Non-surgical treatments don’t create instant density and length. This is added hair or editing, not regrowth

Skin whitening/lightening results tanned skin transformed to lighter, brighter complexion.

Photoshop

AMR Beauty Extra Whitening Crea, India (propylene glycol, arbutin, alpha-arbutin, ‘Giga White’, vitamin E, betinol). None of these can change natural skin tone or ‘whiten’ skin like this. At best, arbutin mildly fades pigmentation over time. The rest of this transformation is lighting, filters, makeup, and Photoshop — unless propylene glycol has evolved from a contact allergen into a professional color-grading tool.😄If this were just a beach tan, time and sunscreen would do the job. The rest is filters.

Full Total Skin Solutions series combining RF Microneedling, Ultra Skin Rejuvenation, and customized spa facials.

Lighting · Pose / angle · Photoshop

The before is artificially degraded, the after is heavily retouched: skin smoothing, color and lighting correction, and makeup added in the ‘after.’ This is digital retouching, not a real before/after. Same photo — identical eye reflections. Photoshop has better skin care results than any treatment.

Six PRP Microneedling treatments

Lighting · Photoshop

The texture mismatch is telling: the ‘before’ appears artificially degraded, while the ‘after’ shows auto-smoothing typical of retouching. The same photo appears to be used (note the identical eye reflections). PRP microneedling improves skin quality gradually; it does not produce pore-free, uniformly smooth skin. This is misleading.

21-day pigment clearance

Lighting · Pose / angle · Photoshop

Claiming this level of pigment clearance in 21 days is anti-science. Even with prescription-strength hydroquinone, tretinoin, azelaic acid, and tranexamic acid, dermatologists measure results in months, often with lasers. This ‘after’ is achieved through lighting, surface effects, and presentation. Photoshop is not not biology.

Skin transformation with Pluune: misleading

Lighting · Pose / angle · Photoshop

This before/after is misleading. Atrophic acne scars are structural dermal defects — they don’t simply vanish with topical recovery serums alone. The changes in the ‘after’ (reduced crater depth, smoother texture, softer shadows) are consistent with lighting, angle, and surface sheen, hydration + Photoshop, not a topical cosmetic effect. No skincare lotion — including ‘skin recovery’ Pluune products — can erase deep scars in a single visible comparison like this.

Before and after 4 sessions of Skin Needling — amazing results...

Lighting · Pose / angle · Photoshop

This is misleading. Microneedling does not resolve active acne lesions, and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation does not fade this uniformly in a short timeframe. The ‘after’ also uses softer lighting and surface shine that reduce visible texture and contrast

6 weeks after procedure — filler plus Botox

Lighting · Pose / angle · Photoshop

This goes way beyond what Botox and fillers can do. Facial slimming, nose reshaping (even the bridge), uniform pore reduction, and what looks like changed bone structure point to lighting, styling, a better shooting angle, and digital retouching rather than injectables alone. Injectables don’t rewrite facial anatomy.